Latest NewsUser login |
CONNECTICUTCT: DPUC Decision on AT$T FranchisePosted on October 18, 2007 - 7:50am.
DPUC Decision, October 15, 2007, Docket No. 07-10-04 Excerpt ORDERS AT&T shall apply for a cable franchise pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. §16-331 et. seq. no later than December 31, 2007. AT&T may continue to serve its existing video subscribers until such time as the Department rules upon an application for cable franchise submitted pursuant to Order No. 1. AT&T shall cease and desist from marketing to or contracting with any additional customers for its cable programming operations in the State of Connecticut until such time as AT&T has obtained a duly authorized cable franchise pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. §16-331 et. seq. CT: AT$T threatens to take its ball and go home over Connecticut TV rulesPosted on October 18, 2007 - 7:43am.
from: Ars Technica AT&T threatens to take its ball and go home over Connecticut TV rules By Nate Anderson | Published: October 16, 2007 - 01:11PM CT Despite the presence of a new Connecticut law setting up statewide video franchises for new entrants, the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC) yesterday rejected AT&T's bid for such a license. AT&T, which refuses to take out traditional video franchises with local communities (as cable companies have done across the country) is now threatening to pull its U-Verse out of Connecticut, fire 300 Connecticut workers, and redirect over $300 million of investment money to nearby states. CT: Regulators order AT$T to apply for cable TV license for 'U-verse'Posted on October 15, 2007 - 9:56pm.
from: Stamford Advocate Regulators order AT&T to apply for cable TV license for 'U-verse' Associated Press NEW BRITAIN, Conn. -- State utility regulators on Monday ordered AT&T to get a cable television license for the Internet protocol-based TV service it is currently providing in Connecticut. CT: AT$T, State In Web TV TanglePosted on October 15, 2007 - 7:23am.
from: Hartford Business AT&T, State In Web TV Tangle Can company ignore a federal court ruling? By Mary Johnson Legal papers were flying faster than electrons last week as AT&T battled both the Connecticut Attorney General and the state Office of Consumer Counsel to keep expanding its U-verse video service. CT: Town at Odds with AT$T over U-VersePosted on October 12, 2007 - 8:15am.
From: New Haven Register Town at Odds with AT&T over U-Verse WALLINGFORD - Democratic Councilman Michael Brodlinsky said AT&T's U-Verse television service - CT: Battle over AT$T's U-verse TV service rages onPosted on October 12, 2007 - 8:07am.
from: Republican American Thursday, October 11, 2007 10:24 PM EDT Battle over AT&T's U-verse TV service rages on BY DAVID KRECHEVSKY REPUBLICAN-AMERICAN The legal battle over AT&T's U-verse television service continued this week on two fronts, with each side now looking to have competing rulings tossed out. CT: Franchise Battle ContinuesPosted on October 10, 2007 - 6:47pm.
from: Fierce IPTV Connecticut Franchise Battle Continues October 9, 2007 The attorney general in Connecticut is not backing down in his quest to make sure AT&T’s U-verse is subject to the same requirements as cable TV operations. Attorney General Richard Blumenthal’s latest volley is a public request that AT&T’s franchise application be rejected, which seems counterintuitive on its face. Blumenthal fought to make AT&T obtain a franchise license from the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control in August. The PUC was all about letting AT&T slide, but a federal judge suggested otherwise. CT: ATT franchise issue not yet resolvedPosted on October 6, 2007 - 9:31am.
from: New Times ATT franchise issue not yet resolved State regulators will continue to review AT&T's application to provide Internet TV despite a federal court ruling Tuesday saying the service should be regulated as a cable franchise. Beryl Lyons, a Department of Public Utility Control spokeswoman, said the agency is aware of Tuesday's court ruling but, because of a new state law that governs video service, the issue of licensing AT&T as a cable franchise is moot. CT: AT$T won’t halt TV servicesPosted on October 4, 2007 - 8:15am.
from: New Haven Register AT&T won’t halt TV services -HARTFORD — AT&T executives insisted Wednesday that an adverse federal court ruling won’t curtail operation of their new television service, saying they will continue to offer alternative TV to more than 100,000 consumers. CT: AT$T's TV service suffers a setback in federal courtPosted on October 4, 2007 - 8:08am.
from: Stamford Advocate AT&T's TV service suffers a setback in federal court October 3, 2007 AT&T lost some ground yesterday in its ongoing battle with cable and satellite television. The telecommunications giant's efforts to compete through its fiber-optic U-verse, available in several Fairfield County communities, were dealt a setback by a federal judge in New Haven. ( categories: CONNECTICUT | State Franchises )
|
Media You Can Use!Add our link to your site Campaign SupportersJoin the Campaign! And tens of thousands of voters... |