Latest NewsUser login |
AT&TIN: AT$T Is Holding Up Road Projects, Municipalities ClaimPosted on June 20, 2007 - 10:38pm.
from: Indianapolis Business Journal AT&T Is Holding Up Road Projects, Municipalities Claim Weeks after Indianapolis sued AT&T Indiana for costly delays in relocating phones wire for a road project, Hendricks County officials say the phone company has put them behind schedule and thousands of dollars over budget. AT$T files FCC access complaint against CablevisionPosted on June 18, 2007 - 7:29pm.
from: Washington Post AT&T files FCC access complaint against Cablevision By Peter Kaplan WASHINGTON (Reuters) - AT&T Corp. ( categories: AT&T | State Franchises )
State Video Franchise Push GrowsPosted on June 11, 2007 - 9:59pm.
from: Light Reading State Video Franchise Push Grows Ah, the video franchise. Obtaining it is one of the final steps a carrier must take in order to provide television service to a community. Getting one is an arduous task that can take up to two years to complete for each community and has become a big thorn in the side of AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T - message board) and Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ - message board) as they deploy their new TV services. CT: Connecticut Legislators Approve Franchise-Reform BillPosted on June 9, 2007 - 9:42am.
from: MultiChannel News Connecticut Legislators Approve Franchise-Reform Bill AT&T’s U-verse TV Would Face New Regulations if Passed By Linda Haugsted -- Multichannel News, 6/8/2007 Connecticut legislators, on the last night of their session June 6, approved a franchise-reform bill that will subject AT&T's U-verse TV product to some regulation. IL: Consumer protections are cable bill victoryPosted on June 7, 2007 - 8:14pm.
from: Chicago Sun Times Consumer protections are cable bill victory June 7, 2007 You can already get phone service from your cable company. And if a promising bill in Springfield becomes law, you could soon get TV service from your phone company. The result should be a win for customers, not only because the bill will spur competition for TV service as well as phone service, but also because the measure contains some consumer protections that are the strongest in the country. MI: AT$T entrance into local market prompts utility box concernsPosted on June 7, 2007 - 6:35am.
from: Spinal Column AT&T entrance into local market prompts utility box concerns June 06, 2007 - Recent enactment of a new state law pertaining to cable television franchising is the catalyst for AT&T approaching several local communities for permission to begin providing Internet protocol (IP) television, Internet and phone service in the lakes area. Officials in some communities — while not trying to stifle competition for Comcast — have concerns with the new law, which some have argued will curb funding through set fees the service providers pay. Other municipal officials fear utility upgrades by AT&T could have negative aesthetic and public safety effects in their communities, which receive revenues from cable companies in two ways. IL: Cable competition soughtPosted on June 6, 2007 - 5:52am.
from: Chicago Tribune Cable competition sought By Jon Van and Jeffrey Meitrodt The state legislature is making a push to increase competition in the cable television market that will bring a side effect all TV watchers could appreciate: a promised cap in the number of hours spent waiting for the cable guy. TX: Bundling Telecom Services May Not Always Save a BundlePosted on June 5, 2007 - 8:00am.
Note: More evidence of the 'triple ploy'. from: Houston Chronicle Bundling Telecom Services May Not Always Save a Bundle June 5, 2007 Bundling is the buzzword in the telecom industry these days. Cable TV companies, phone companies and Internet providers want to sell us all sorts of services for one price. It’s a big price, but cheaper than paying for each separately, they tell us. OHIO ACTION ALERT SB 117: Call the House Public Utilities Committee TodayPosted on June 4, 2007 - 5:19pm.
We have slightly more than a day to save the Public Interest when it comes to Substitute Bill SB 117. OH: Rumor and disinformation in Ohio StatehousePosted on June 4, 2007 - 10:12am.
Note: We have heard similar reports from other states considering video franchise legislation. It seems the best way to get legislators to change their vote is to misinform them at the last minute. We hope our elected officials will read the fine print of these telco bills before signing off on them. The day that SB 117 passed in the Senate I was at the statehouse and here are a couple of the things I noticed: |
Media You Can Use!Add our link to your site Campaign SupportersJoin the Campaign! And tens of thousands of voters... |